Key Performance Indicator – 3rd and 4th quarter of 2008

The KPI results for the 3rd and 4th quarter of last year (2008) are the same.

Performance Objectives Rating:
0 = Did not achieve at all
1 = Below expectations
2 = Met expectations
3 = Exceeded expectations

Team Member Only:
Timeliness of project deliverables – 2
Compliance with SDLC policies and procedures – 3
Availability to Level 3 Support – 2
Client Satisfaction Feedback – 2
Personal and Professional Development – 2

Team Member Contribution:
Effort – 3
Attitude – 3

Listening – 2
Communication – 3
Teamwork – 2
Leadership – 2

We have not been evaluated yet for the first quarter of 2009 because, logically, the evaluation period will be until the end of March 2009.

Publicités

12 Responses to Key Performance Indicator – 3rd and 4th quarter of 2008

  1. cerise dit :

    I was the one who wrote your emails and taught you how to deal with the managers and other workplace issues for this quarter.

    Wala kang utang na loob.

  2. flora dit :

    Yabang! Haha

    Anyway, congratulations! 😀

    Oh, your bitter-wannabe-girlfriend is not happy for you.

  3. cerise dit :

    Steven will never pass my standards.

    Only b*tchy girls and jerks will assume and make stupid remarks that I am a wanna be girlfriend.

    Steven: Wala kang utang na loob. I fair to you and you tolerated your b*tchy friends to post stupid questions, answers and comments just to show the public that I am your wanna-be girlfriends. You are such a loser.

    Nanligaw si Steven pero basted siya.

    Now it’s up to Steven if he will deny it – only gays deny anyway. A real man will not manipulate things to make it appear that the woman is courting her.

    Steven is not a man and is immature. Ego problem. This entire blog proves it. Enough said.

    I don’t have time for such juvenile arguments.

  4. flora dit :

    Haha!

    Dear, you are so hilarious. Are you delusional? Have you thought of yourself as the goddess of beauty? A girl can dream. Indeed, you are the parody of Venus.

    Your overanalyzing mind has developed into paranoia. Are you a celebrity that is worth to be a subject of gossip? Even if I would say that you are not the person I am referring in my previous comment, I think it would be futile for me to make you understand. Since correcting your presumption is not worth my effort, I would rather let you see reality according to your own liking.

    If Steven will never pass your standards, neither will you pass his standards. I would force him to go to the nearest mental hospital if ever he will want you as his girlfriend.

    I think your problem is that, a typical gesture is interpreted as an overwhelming chivalry. Go buy a time machine and live your life wearing Filipiniana.

    Considering your OLD AGE, you shouldn’t stoop down to the level that you put yourself these days. Since you’ve lost your sensibilities let me point out three important points for you to ponder:

    1) If you are 200% sure that he is courting you then why didn’t you confront him and ask – are you courting? It is because you are too embarrassed to do so. Knowing that he does not even see any interest in you. You are in self-denial that you are not attractive after all (for him).

    2) If you are certain that you pass in his standards, you should not be insecure. You should not think of his girl friends as threats.

    3) If you are the one who taught him everything, you should know how NOT to be discriminatory at workplace. You should not consider irrelevant characteristics as detrimental, such as associating an irrelevant biological trait to a negative trait such as saying he is gay because he denies that he is courting you.

    Your arguments are so wrong and your conclusions are the worst.

    At the end of the day, I have two impressions why you are acting like a desperate-wannabe:

    1) MAKITID ANG PAG-IISIP MO
    2) ANG BABAW NG PAGKATAO MO

    EQ has nothing to do with age and achievements.

    And oh, you remind me of the film ‘à la folie… pas du tout’.. there was this girl who has Erotomania. It is a rare disorder whereby the subject holds a delusional belief that another person, usually of a higher social status, is in love with him or her. In your case, you think Steven is in love with you.

    Lastly, Steven is actually quite a catch! Intelligent, good looking, and responsible. No wonder you go gaga over him. Oh, I forgot to mention, he is young. For sure, he would not like someone who is a spinster-in-the-making. But since you are applying to be his sugar mommy then that’s too bad.

  5. eblogger dit :

    What an attitude Flora.

    Steven is not a man of character at all. Look at what he has done in this blog. If he is a gentleman, he could have resolved issues with Cherry in person instead of asking his girl friends to post things in this blog to attack Cherry.

    If you think he is a catch for you. Maybe you like him and you are jealous.

  6. flora dit :

    Duh!

    Read PROPERLY to SEE how cherry reacts and FEEL how unstable her emotions are. At some point she is outrageous and then apologetic. Even someone who has a small background in Psychology can conclude that she has psychological issues. 🙂

    Assuming I like Steven, it would not be a problem because I would hope but not expect that my « emotional investment » would be reciprocated. And besides, I can always tell him straightforwardly. Just in case he rejects me, it is not the end of my life. Because LIKE is totally different from OBSESSION. It so happen that Cherry is obsessed.

    Here, look at your way of formulating an assumption:

    MY OPINION: He is a catch.
    YOUR FIRST ASSUMPTION BASED ON MY OPINION: You like him.
    YOUR SECOND ASSUMPTION BASED ON YOUR FIRST ASSUMPTION: You are jealous.

    1st point: Intelligence + looks + personality = are qualities that define someone as a catch. Intelligence is seen in one’s reasoning, looks is outside appearance, and personality is a visible aspect of one’s character. Being able to see these QUALITIES does not require an emotion. Yet, it requires good judgment.

    2nd point: Is likeness and jealousy mutually exclusives? Does it follow that if a person likes someone there must be some degree of jealousy? If that is your way of looking at things (so much like Cherry) then it explains the very reason why Cherry sees the friends of Steven as threats. And it is not a question whether you are capable to doing the same thing.

  7. flora dit :

    Why do you assume that he asked his friends to defend himself? He can do that if he wants to but he didn’t because he knows it is a waste of time. He has a wonderful circle of friends.

    If Steven is not a man of character at all then he would not have some friends to speak for him and stand with him.

  8. eblogger dit :

    Steven posted this blog to have his girl friends speak for him because he is too lame to speak for himself.

    Steven is not a man of character because his friends are not women of character as well.

  9. eblogger dit :

    Flora – read properly and objectively all the comments and it shows that you really like Steven and you are very obssessed in defending for him. You are like his motherly girlfriend wanna be.

    Steven is not intelligent. An intelligent person will not post this kind of immature blog. An intelligent person don’t have stupid friends.

    ex. I said « MAYBE you like him and you are jealous. » and you take it as an assumption.

    Personality and character are both visible and are entirely different stupid! You don’t even know what these are because you don’t have them.

    Your attutides and lack of character are really threatening and the girl friends of Steven are reacting and speaking in very barbaric ways – this blog proves it.

    The comments of Ms. Cherry clearly states she was the one who rejected Steven and you are declaring otherwise while you are not even involved in every conversation they had and you are just trying to meddle and attack Ms. Cherry.

    Psychology might not be enough for you. You need psychiatry.

  10. flora dit :

    « Flora – read properly and objectively all the comments and it shows that you really like Steven and you are very OBSESSED in defending for him. You are like his motherly girlfriend wanna be. »

    ***Being maternal is a desirable quality. Unless of course, you are a topdog-nagging-mom who embraces dictatorship like Cherry.

    An assumption is a guess. Read again « MAYBE you like him and you are jealous. » Hence, you were guessing that I like him and I am jealous. To formulate an assumption is to hypothesize. In science, hypothesis is an educated guess. So, yes I was wrong of saying that it is an assumption because yours have no basis whatsoever. YOURS IS A STUPID GUESS. More correct > AN IGNORANT GUESS. No wonder your CONCLUSIONS are WRONG.

    « Steven is not intelligent. An intelligent person will not post this kind of immature blog. An intelligent person don’t have stupid friends. »

    ***Intelligence is the capacity of a person in grasping truths. Unfortunately, Cherry cannot grasp the truth that Steven has no feelings for her. Would it be incorrect to label her as a moron? (I am asking, so relax)

    « Personality and character are both visible and are entirely different stupid! You don’t even know what these are because you don’t have them. »

    ***Character and personality are not the same. Concede. But is there a man of character who lacks personality? Maybe, Cherry? Oh! I mean a woman of character.

    « Your ATTITUDE and lack of character are really threatening and the girl friends of Steven are reacting and speaking in very barbaric ways – this blog proves it. »

    ***It is not my fault if your way of looking at things is myopic. Your sentiments are exactly the same with Cherry. Your way of reasoning, expression, and attack are identical to Cherry’s.

    I neither claim nor do I have to prove that I have personality and character. But I can prove that Cherry is in scarcity of both.

    « The comments of Ms. Cherry clearly states she was the one who rejected Steven and you are declaring otherwise while you are not even involved in every conversation they had and you are just trying to meddle and attack Ms. Cherry. »

    ***If you were not Cherry, then we are definitely in the same ground. What do you think you’re doing, isn’t that what you call meddling?

    cherry’s emotion is UNSTABLE. It is even more confusing than her comments. Nonetheless, her comments are crystal clear for you, because you are Cherry? 😀

    I have the right of freedom of expression. Too bad, I cannot stand reading something that is flawed. Is it evil to make you realize how contemptuous her behavior is (and yours too)?

    Cherry REJECTED Steven? She should not be so affected then. But why is she over reacting? Why?

    « Psychology might not be enough for you. You need psychiatry. »

    ***True, I even look forward of meeting a psychiatrist. Because I want to hear some sensible suggestions on how to properly deal with you, psycho.

  11. cherry dit :

    What a psychopatic reply.

    I am licensed to give you a recommendation to a psychiatrist.

    All your comments show your stupidity, you are barking at the wrong tree.

    Argumentum non siquitur.

  12. flora dit :

    Hayyy… at first I really thought this is entertaining. So if I am obsessed at something, it would be reading your funny remarks. I am just sad that you are buying everything that I have to say even if they truly do not matter (at least, the way I think of them).

    Maawa ka naman sa sarili mo. PLEASE, spare yourself a little dignity and pride.

    You are all bark but no bite.

    Cherry, move on.. do not impose the things you believe to be true because each individual has their own way of seeing things.

    I’m done.

Laisser un commentaire

Entrez vos coordonnées ci-dessous ou cliquez sur une icône pour vous connecter:

Logo WordPress.com

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte WordPress.com. Déconnexion / Changer )

Image Twitter

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Twitter. Déconnexion / Changer )

Photo Facebook

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Facebook. Déconnexion / Changer )

Photo Google+

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Google+. Déconnexion / Changer )

Connexion à %s

%d blogueurs aiment cette page :